Somewhat to my surprise I (Neil Hickman) appear to have found myself on
Chris Ross' mailing list and received this painstakingly annotated game in my
inbox. I have seldom seen such a thorough and brutally honest explanation by a
strong player of what he considered was going on in one of his games. Has
Fritz punched a (thematic) hole in Chris' analysis? Look at the position at
move 26 and see what you think. The game is well worth studying even if Chris'
explanation turns out to have a hole in it.